Avoiding Side Effects in Implementing Health Insurance Reform

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes
nejm.jpgThe January 27 edition of the New England Journal of Medicine has a detailed article by Dr. Mark Pauly on health insurance reform, specifically on how to deal with higher risk individuals.

 

All U.S. health insurance reform proposals currently being discussed now include changes in the way insurers treat some people with above-average health risks. In most states, insurers who sellpolicies directly to individuals now charge premiums based to some extent on characteristics thought to predict the risk of high-cost conditions; insurers also exclude some or all preexistingconditions from coverage and simply refuse to cover some people. Without such "risk rating" and coverage exclusions, insurers would be subject to substantial adverse selection -- that is, consumers would seek them out primarily if and when they became ill and therefore represented higher risks to insurers -- which could lead insurers needing to cover their costs to charge premiums so high they would drive lower-risk consumers to choose minimal coverage or forgo insurance altogether.

 

Some states have decided that adverse selection is a lesser evil than people being left uninsured and have passed regulations that require insurance companies to charge the same premiums to everyone in a certain geographic area ( a practice called "community rating.")  Dr. Pauly suggests an alternative approach: the guaranteed renewability policy.  He argues that these policies, that already exists in today's insurance markets, are the best way to wring efficiency an efficacy from the system.   In a nutshell,  these policies charge a small premium for the right of the insured to continually renew his or her policy at the standard class rate even if they develop a high risk or chronic condition.   The insured person benefits from the security of knowing that their insurance will not be cancelled or their rates raised because of serious illness and the insurance company benefits because people will purchase these policies while they low risk (young and healthy). 

 

To read the article in its entirety, please click here

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blog.imedexchange.com/admin/mt-tb.cgi/590.

About VITALSIGNS

VitalSigns provides physicians with a unique, concise source of information on health reform and policy that has been specially selected to be both interesting and actionable... read more

Engage

Join ImedExchange

Follow Us on Twitter

RSS Subscription

  • Google Reader or Homepage
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe to my feed
  • Add to My MSN!
  • Add to My AOL!
  • Add to Technorati Favorites!
  • Subscribe in myEarthlink

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Angie published on January 28, 2010 6:04 PM.

Health Care Reform Takes a Back Seat in State of Union Address was the previous entry in this blog.

Was Massachusetts a referendum on health care reform? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.