pass.jpg

Late this evening, the House voted 219 to 212 to pass the health care reconciliation bill.  No Republicans voted for the bill and 34 Democrats also voted no.   From NPR News:

 

Capping a year of legislative activity and ending decades of Democratic frustration, the House on Sunday passed a bill designed to provide widespread health coverage to Americans.

"We have come to a defining moment in our nation's history," said James Clyburn (D-SC), the House Democratic whip. "This is the civil rights act of the 21st century."

As the GOP promised, not a single Republican voted for the measure. "This is truly a remarkable moment in the life of this nation. Some say we're making history. I say we're breaking history, breaking with our best traditions," said Mike Pence (R-IN), who chairs the House GOP Conference. "Only in Washington, D.C, can you spend a trillion dollars and say that you're saving the taxpayers money."


 

The AMA has announced its qualified support of passage of health system reform legislation that the U.S. House of Representatives that on Sunday, March 21, is expected to go up for a vote. From the AMA letter of support to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi:

By extending coverage to the vast majority of the uninsured, improving competition and choice in the insurance marketplace, promoting prevention and wellness, reducing administrative burdens, and promoting clinical comparative effectiveness research, we believe that H.R. 3590 does, in fact, improve the ability of patients and their physicians to achieve better health outcomes.


 
clock.jpg

As the House debate on the health bill heads into late evening, the rhetoric is just as divided along partisan lines as the final vote will be.

Democrats appear confident that they will have the 216 votes needed to pass a pair of bills designed to provide near-universal health insurance coverage. Republicans, who are unanimous in their opposition, have described the bills as "a disgrace."

The quest for widespread health care coverage has gone on for a century. Democrats are highly aware that they are about to prevail on a historic vote, making references to past landmark legislation such as Social Security and figures such as Martin Luther King Jr.


 
report card.gif

In good news for Democrats, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has released its analysis of the compromise health care bill.  The Democratic health care bill would cost $940 billion over 10 years but would also cut the federal deficit over the next two decades -- figures that should help ease the worries of fiscal hawks who have been reluctant about supporting the sweeping measure.

 

The bill would reduce the deficit by $138 billion in the first 10 years and by $1.2 trillion over the second 10 years, while expanding health coverage to 95% of Americans. 

 

Congressional Budget Office releases health bill estimates -Politico, March 19, 2010. 

 

For the  CBO report, click here

 

House leaders announced a $940 billion compromise bill that would extend coverage to the vast majority of Americans, cut billions of dollars from Medicare, and impose new taxes on the wealthy and the well-insured.  From The Washington Post:

 

The compromise would extend coverage to an additional 32 million Americans over the next decade by expanding Medicaid eligibility and creating state-run insurance exchanges and federal subsidies for lower-income families who lack access to employer-provided coverage.

All Americans would be required for the first time to obtain insurance or face an annual penalty of $695; employers could face penalties of $2,000 per worker for not offering affordable coverage. In exchange for the new business, private insurers would be subject to an array of rules, including a ban on the practice of denying coverage to people with preexisting medical conditions and a requirement that adult children be permitted to stay on their parents' policies until age 26.

Compared with the Senate bill, the compromise would offer more generous tax credits to people who may otherwise be unable to afford insurance and would fully close the "doughnut hole" -- a gap in the Medicare prescription drug program that is costly for many seniors -- beginning with a $250 rebate for those affected this year.

 

For the full story click here: House Leaders Announce $940 Billion Health Care Compromise Bill; The Washington Post - March 19, 2010

 

Related Coverage:

 

Fine-Tuning Led to Health Bill's $940 Billion Price Tag - The New York Times--March 19, 2010

Democrats Say Health Bill Will Pay for Itself in the Long Run; The New York Times - March 19, 2010

 

Op-Ed - I worked for Snowe

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes
The NY Times featured an Op-Ed today written by William Pewen, a former senior health policy advisor for Olympia Snowe.

While Democrats may yet enact health care reform via a convoluted process that involves passing three separate bills, many people may wonder, "What happened to the postpartisan era?" Both President Obama's 11th-hour meeting with Republicans and the Republican leaders' demands to "start over" are recognized by Americans for what they are -- political talk substituting for bipartisan legislation.

As health policy adviser for Senator Olympia Snowe, the Maine Republican, while Congress considered this most critical and complicated issue, I saw firsthand how a failure to recognize the magnitude of the task, and a toxic political environment, undermined the effort to achieve reform.

Read the full story here.
 

Tracking the votes

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes
yes no.jpgThe Hill is keeping a running count of the votes and positions of democrats on the health care reform bill. Among their notes today are...

Firm No, Leaning No, Likely No (36)
John Adler (N.J.) 
(N) Waiting to see bill. Sounded like a no on Fox News, saying House and Senate bills fail to address cost containment
Michael Arcuri (N.Y.)
 (Y) Some reports have him as firm no, but Rules Committee member hasn't closed the door yet
John Barrow (Ga.)
 * (N) Voted no last year in committee and on floor. Likely no 
Marion Berry (Ark.)
 * (Y) Has been critical of the president since announcing his retirement. Strong backer of Stupak language
Dan Boren (Okla.) * (N) Won't be changing his mind -- firm no 
Rick Boucher (Va.) (N) GOP target who has told local press outlets in Virginia he has major problems with Medicare cuts and "unsavory deal making" that benefited Nebraska, Louisiana and Florida. Leaning no

 
Kaiser Health asks 5 questions about the proposed changes to the medicare payroll tax. They ask...

Should affluent Americans have to pay Medicare payroll tax on their investment income? 

President Barack Obama, to help pay for his health care overhaul package, is proposing that high-income Americans pay Medicare taxes on the money they make on their investments. Historically, only earned income has been subject to that tax. He also wants to increase the Medicare tax rate on wealthy Americans' wages.
President Barack Obama, to help pay for his health care overhaul package, is proposing that high-income Americans pay Medicare taxes on the money they make on their investments. Historically, only earned income has been subject to that tax. He also wants to increase the Medicare tax rate on wealthy Americans' wages.

The 5 questions and answers include: what was proposed, how would the taxes work, who would be affected,  and what are the major arguments. Read the full story here.
 
If addiction is a disease the I have a very bad disease indeed.  No doctor has ever been able to offer a cure.  In fact, many of the physicians I know also have the same disease are are similarly powerless to cure it in themselves.  Golf.  If you suffer the condition yourself you know it can be a non-trivial affliction. 

Physicians have long been attracted to the game and from the very earliest days of golf, physicians we're involved.  Here's a brief, fun history of a couple of doctor golfers who were there as the game was taking shape.  In more recent times, a number of physicians have made their way onto the PGA Tour and Champions Tour circuits and have won many events.  Even Golf Digest has a special ranking of the top-250 physician golfers

In recognition of the love affair with golf that so many docs share, when we added a travel benefit to iMX Advantage (the iMedExchange member benefits program) we started with a first-class pilgrimage to Augusta for the 2010 Masters in April.  As is, that trip package was the best we could find anywhere at any price.  But when we called our travel partner, Horizon & Co., and asked them what they would do for our physician members they rolled out the red carpet.  In addition to including exclusive iMedExchange-only amenities like a private car service from the airport and special concierge service on the course, iMedExchange members also get a huge discount of as much as $1,700!  If you are a physician who loves golf (or you know one that does) then you owe it to yourself (or them) to check out this incredible offer.  To learn more about this terrific opportunity, check out the Horizon & Co. offer in the iMX Advantage program page inside iMedExchange.
 
wbuffett.jpgPolitico summarized the interview Warren Buffet did with CNBC. 

Billionaire investor Warren Buffett advised President Barack Obama on Monday to scrap the health care bill and start over.

In an interview with CNBC, Buffett said the current bill does not focus on controlling costs, which he sees as the central problem that must be addressed to reform the system. He added that while he does not like the Senate bill, he'd vote for it in preference to doing nothing.

"What we have now is untenable over time," said Buffett, an early supporter of Obama's candidacy. "That kind of a cost compared to the rest of the world is really like a tapeworm eating, you know, at our economic body."
 
thumbs.jpg

Coverage on President Obama's push for health care reform continues in all major media outlets.  In a speech on March 3, the president  urged lawmakers to bring the matter to a vote before the end of the month.    From The New York Times:

 

President Obama, beginning his final push for a health care overhaul, called Wednesday for Congress to allow an "up or down vote" on the measure, and sketched out an ambitious -- and, some Democrats said, unrealistic -- timetable for his party to pass a bill on its own within weeks.

 

States Congress owes the American people a final vote on health care reform," Mr. Obama said during a 20-minute speech in the East Room of the White House. He said there was no point in starting over, as Republicans are demanding, and called on nervous Democrats to stick with him, declaring there was no reason "for those of us who were sent here to lead to just walk away."

 

The speech, less than a week after Mr. Obama held a high-profile televised health care forum, will usher in what White House officials say will be their last campaign to bring Washington's long and contentious health care debate to a close -- with a bill-signing ceremony at the end.

 

Read the full story here.

 

 

Related coverage:

Obama Health Care Speech:  It's Time to Act Now; The Huffington Post - March 4, 2010

 Health Reform's Reconciliation Ref - Alan Frumin; Time - March 3, 2010

Democrats Chase Health Care Votes; The Wall Street Journal - March 3, 2010

Nelson Defends Senate Health Bill, Signals Strong Backing for Reform; The Hill - March 3, 2010

Democrats Eye Health Care Finish; Roll Call - March 3, 2010

Political Punch; ABC News - March 2, 2010

Obama To Push Health Care Overhaul Into Final Act; Reuters - March 3, 2010

 

Democrats are moving forward on health care reform, even if it may cost some of them their congressional careers.  From The New York Times:

 

Speaker Nancy Pelosi says she is confident she will be able to get the votes needed to pass sweeping health care legislation in the House, even if it threatens the political careers of some members of her party.

 

In an interview carried Sunday on ABC's "This Week," Ms. Pelosi said she was working on changes to a Senate-passed bill that would make it acceptable to the House.

 


 
JBD.jpg

Member: Johnny Delashaw, MD


Specialty: Neurosurgery


Place of Work: OHSU; Portland, OR


Medical School: University of Washington

 

 

Q: How long have you been practicing for?

-          "I finished my residency in 1990, so it has been 20 years."

Q: How and when did you decide that you wanted to practice medicine?

-          "My father was a physician, so I had some exposure to it. Actually, I started getting interested when I was an undergrad studying sleep research at Stanford University and in those days they were significantly involved in Sleep Research. I ended up doing brain surgery on cats and dogs and took care of a number of animals who had sleep disorders. I think that my interest in sleep was a big part of why I decided to go into medicine."

Q: How did you choose OHSU?

-          "First of all, I did my training in Virginia and did a year of training in England, and when I finished my training, I went down and became part of the faculty at the University of Florida. I'm from Longview, Washington originally so when I was offered to return to Portland and be within a short distance of my family, it was an easy decision and I've been there since 1992."

Q: Tell me about your life outside of your practice.

Thumbnail image for DESCHUTES ANGLER.jpg

-          "I'm an avid fly fisherman. I'm part owner of a fly fishing shop on the Deschutes River, "The Deschutes Angler", and I spend most of my free time either planning fishing trips or fishing locally on rivers like the North Umpqua in Roseburg, OR, the Clackamas, among many others. I also make fishing trips up to my cabin west of Anchorage, Alaska, and to Central America 2-3 times per year."


Q: As far as Social Media goes, what do you see its potential being within the context of the medical profession?

 "Social Media will help physicians a lot with simple networking. Ideally, I will be able to help other doctors with problems and they can help me with problems; they can send me patients and I can send them complicated cases for input."

 

Among the criticisms of health care reform offered by Republicans, Tea Partiers, and others is that it is simply too costly.  But what is the cost of doing nothing?

 

"People think if we do nothing, we will have what we have now," said Karen Davis, the president of the Commonwealth Fund, a nonprofit health care research group in New York. "In fact, what we will have is a substantial deterioration in what we have."

 

Nearly every mainstream analysis calls for medical costs to continue to climb over the next decade, outpacing the growth in the overall economy and certainly increasing faster than the average paycheck. Those higher costs will translate into higher premiums, which will mean fewer individuals and businesses will be able to afford insurance coverage. More of everyone's dollar will go to health care, and government programs like Medicare and Medicaid will struggle to find the money to operate.

 


 

Coverage of the aftermath of the Health Care Summit is extensive, with most media outlets reporting that Democrats plan to move forward with the Obama plan with or without the help of Republicans but that it remains uncertain whether the necessary votes will materialize:

 

Obama, Democrats Ponder Next Health Care Moves; Reuters - February 26, 2010        

Now the White House and congressional Democrats are in the difficult position of deciding whether to force a reform of the $2.5 trillion U.S. health care system through Congress with a simple majority vote - a maneuver Republicans have condemned.

 

Obama Bipartisan Health Summit Clears Path to Party-Line Vote; The Bloomberg Report - February 26, 2010

President Obama began yesterday's health care summit saying he wanted to find bipartisan ways to fix the health care system. By the end of the health care summit, President Obama will pursue a partisan plan costing about $950 billion over 10 years and covering 31 million uninsured Americans.

 

After Summit Flop, Democrats Prepare to Go It Alone on Obamacare; The Washington Examiner - February 26, 2010

With no signs of compromise from either side in President Obama's health summit, Democrats prepared a final partisan push for their massive health care plan.

 

The Aftermath of the Health Care Summit:  Confusion, Conflict; Politico - February 26, 2010

Post summit means a democratic party looking to emerge with a clear sense of the path forward instead finding itself in the same old place - fighting the clock to finish health care, with an uncertain timeline, a complex legislative path and no idea if its leaders can muster the votes.

About VITALSIGNS

VitalSigns provides physicians with a unique, concise source of information on health reform and policy that has been specially selected to be both interesting and actionable... read more

Engage

Join ImedExchange

Follow Us on Twitter

RSS Subscription

  • Google Reader or Homepage
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe to my feed
  • Add to My MSN!
  • Add to My AOL!
  • Add to Technorati Favorites!
  • Subscribe in myEarthlink